srakabenefits.blogg.se

The blair witch project 2016 rating
The blair witch project 2016 rating













the blair witch project 2016 rating

On Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 96% based on 167 reviews, with an average rating of 8.7/10. This time around, there's a bigger budget and more. It became highest box-office of all time. ) This week, however, one of Hollywood's most original stories of the last couple decades, The Blair Witch Project, is getting the 2016 update. The digital was released on Octoin the United States, and Octoin Canada, and Blu-Ray, DVD, and 4K Ultra HD Blu-Ray was released on Octoin the United States, and on Octoin Canada.Ī reboot of The Blair Witch Project has grossed $314.1 million in the United States and Canada, and $898.9 million in other territories, for a worldwide total of $1.213 billion. Cast and Crew The Blair Witch Project is directed by Daniel Myrick, Eduardo Snchez and stars Heather Donahue, Michael C. Note: A new sequel titled Blair Witch is releasing September 16, 2016. The finders (Wes Robinson, Valorie Curry) join their camping trip, YOLO style.The Blair Witch Project was released on Jin the United States, and on Jin Canada. This low budget production did extremely well at the box office and went on the inspire a sequel: Book of Shadows: The Blair Witch 2.

the blair witch project 2016 rating

Blair Witch picks up with her brother James (James Allen McCune) and three friends (Callie Hernandez, Corbin Reid, Brandon Scott) heading to the Burkittsville woods, where new found footage may show what happened to Heather. Wingard either has little regard for the original's creativity, or zero respect for an audience he believes is too stupid to notice.ĭonahue played "herself" in the original, part of the filmmakers' facade of veracity.

THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT 2016 RATING MOVIE

Nothing in this movie matches even Heather Donahue's first-movie snot bubble for realism. No amount of superimposed pause button blips and edits can make such artificiality believable. Perhaps for someone who never saw The Blair Witch Project, this might represent an adequate. Jump scares (which Blair Witch relies on too often) have become the province of the lazy filmmaker. Found footage has evolved from being edgy and interesting to being an overused joke. "Let's talk it over in private," one character says, and the recorder rolls on. But this is 2016 and not 2000 and the horror genre has moved on. The Blair Witch Project is quite the opposite: lacking in jump scares but filled with deeply psychological horror. Other scenes simply don't feel like occasions when the camera would be on. Blair Witch feels momentary it’ll make you jump a few times in the theater, but it won’t keep you up at night. Who exactly is holding the camera when it jitter-pans past every character and none possess even a Go-Pro? Is there a third, invisible person in the tent with two others in nervous discussion? How can a victim crawling through a tight tunnel record herself head-on without aiming a camera at her face? And who in the name of escape would do so, anyway? Then practically every second of Blair Witch refutes that creative promise, reminding viewers that it's only a movie. The Blair Witch Project was a big talking point when it came out, particularly as people at first did not know whether it was real or not, it is still considered a breakthrough scary movie, the rubbish sequel Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 should be discounted, this is the true follow-up that people were interested in, seventeen years later. Wingard sets up Blair Witch with a similar title card pledge, that everything in his movie is culled from digital footage discovered in the same Maryland forest.















The blair witch project 2016 rating